tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post518716793410178724..comments2023-10-29T13:33:18.452+00:00Comments on Anthony Peake's Cheating The Ferryman Blog Page: Where Is The Internet? (An Analogy)Anthony Peakehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12199138770925114308noreply@blogger.comBlogger81125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-7072117747025135622008-09-23T01:07:00.000+01:002008-09-23T01:07:00.000+01:00Cam: I hope you now grasp the difference between S...<B>Cam</B>: I hope you now grasp the difference between Subjective Time and Objective Time / Eidolonic Time and Daemonic Time / Phaneronic Time and Observed Time following our FORUM discussion around this question and do not need me to repeat here.<BR/><BR/>Thank you for you kind comments regarding my post Cam, I'm glad you enjoyed it and that it helped your understanding of my CtCw theory of Consciousness.Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-75613330874930295392008-09-10T20:55:00.000+01:002008-09-10T20:55:00.000+01:00Karl: A question ... how does a rewrite of the Bo...Karl: A question ... how does a rewrite of the Bohmian Imax "DVD" if you like, subdivide Space / Time, if it is simply a recording over top the old recording ?<BR/><BR/>Thx - CamAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-61637943880142122602008-06-11T13:49:00.000+01:002008-06-11T13:49:00.000+01:00Andrew: Fabulous to have you onboard young man!<B>Andrew</B>: Fabulous to have you onboard young man!Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-36979892912350664982008-06-11T13:18:00.000+01:002008-06-11T13:18:00.000+01:00I have accepted your invitation, sir, with thanks....I have accepted your invitation, sir, with thanks. AGKAndrew Giancarlohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06890840951218559158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-45278807507936480112008-06-09T22:18:00.000+01:002008-06-09T22:18:00.000+01:00Andrew Giancarlo: ANDREW DEAR BOY!WOW, thank you. ...<B>Andrew Giancarlo</B>: ANDREW DEAR BOY!<BR/><BR/>WOW, thank you. I’m sure that your dear Mother will tell you that if you want any guidance or advice of what to read, where to look etc regarding Quantum Physics and Philosophy then I am only too happy to assist.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://cheatingtheferryman.blogspot.com/2008/04/sensation-of-being-stared-at.html" REL="nofollow"><B>The ‘Sensation’ of Being Stared At</B></A> post did become a mammoth read didn’t it, but I still enjoy reading through it as it’s a perfect example of what this blog can do when we pull together on an idea and work with each other.<BR/><BR/>Your comments are deeply humbling, especially as they come from you, at age 20, at the start of your glorious adulthood and from such esteemed lineage as your Mother, you dearly missed Father and your heritage.<BR/><BR/>I *bow respectfully* to you for taking the time to write this Andrew, and I am delighted beyond words that my simple ramblings have affected someone so young, so far away and so self-aware. <BR/><BR/>Thank You.Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-62528949751868949112008-06-09T13:08:00.000+01:002008-06-09T13:08:00.000+01:00Mr. Peake,I am amazed and honored by your offer an...Mr. Peake,<BR/>I am amazed and honored by your offer and have emailed you. Thank you.<BR/>Andrew G. KovalinskyAndrew Giancarlohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06890840951218559158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-153050897181490672008-06-09T08:17:00.000+01:002008-06-09T08:17:00.000+01:00ANDREW: Wonderful to have you on board. Great comm...ANDREW: Wonderful to have you on board. Great comments and great questions. I am really looking forward to the comments and contributions that younger people like yourself have with regard to ITLAD and its implications. Indeed recently we have had a few comments form people in their early 20's ((This will upset Hurly Burly as he likes to be considered the baby of the group!!). Chris, for example.<BR/><BR/>I am really keen to involve guys like yourself with young, fresh ideas. Would you consider a "full Membership" so that you can place your own postings and start your own threads? I would be honoured if you considered this. If you do just drop me an email on cheattheferryman@aol.com and I will set it up.<BR/><BR/>Cheers<BR/><BR/>TonyAnthony Peakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12199138770925114308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-20066247603713649072008-06-07T23:02:00.000+01:002008-06-07T23:02:00.000+01:00Dear Mr. Lemarcs,I have decided to give comments t...Dear Mr. Lemarcs,<BR/>I have decided to give comments to you now since I was able to work up courage to post for Hurlyburly. I am 20 and since all my time is spent on US political theory I still don't know where I should firmly stand with quantum philosophy. But I do know it is important and I know brilliance when I see it. I have read all of your posts and I was never able to get done with your "Sensation of Being Stared At", I just kept going back to it and could not stay away. I don't have your experience or your expertise and I am not the kind of guy who talks a lot unless I can add something meaningful. I wish I could learn more about all the things you are an expert in but I can only read and take it in and be full of admiration. My mother is a philosopher so she helps me to work on understanding you and Hurly and Mr. Peake in that area. And I agree with the things she says and that your book is needed by us over here ( I do read quite a bit about American religion and spirituality because it drives our politics over here. and this I do on my own, not for my classes) and I know that quantum philosophy is the 21st century state of intellectual theory. One of my favorite books on political ideology is Michael Lind's Up From Conservatism and maybe you are part of that trend but with quantum science and technology. So men like you are the front guard. I wish I had more to say and when I am reading you I do. I even take notes on your writings and wrote out all the terms. Thank you for listening to my comments. A lot is pretty lame but I will get better with more studying and then I hopefully will speak on a level befitting men like you and Hurlyburly.Andrew Giancarlohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06890840951218559158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-86040986167697678032008-05-24T11:40:00.000+01:002008-05-24T11:40:00.000+01:00It is worth adding here that the reaction that Ton...It is worth adding here that the reaction that Tony and I received to his ITLAD/CTF theory and also my own CtCw (Collapsing the Consciousness Wave) theory last evening from the <B>Servants Of The Light</B> was astonishing!!<BR/><BR/>And all of you, everyone, who has read Tony's book and has been a part of the development of my theory should take much personal pride in this. <BR/><BR/>I THANK YOU all, personally.<BR/><BR/><B>A Dark Philosopher<BR/>Karl L Le Marcs</B>Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-69701818453344463822008-05-20T00:13:00.000+01:002008-05-20T00:13:00.000+01:00Susan Marie: Enormous THANK YOU for your wonderful...<B>Susan Marie</B>: Enormous THANK YOU for your wonderful reply to my question to you regarding the American mindset relating to the Scientific/Spiritual schism.<BR/>I agree with your words and your sentiment and hope we can collectively, or myself individually, can do something to bridge it soon.<BR/><BR/><B>RAC</B>: Quoting Max Planck <B>constantly</B> eh?<BR/><BR/>*Quantum giggles once more*<BR/><BR/>Within the deeper (much deeper) writing I have done on my theory I do propose an answer to the Evolution/Creation question, which will surely open eyes wider than the Mexican Staring Frog has on being told something particularly alarming!!<BR/>And Sheldrake is a good example yes, I referenced his work in my original "The 'Sensation' Of Being Stared At" post (not the Mexican Staring Frog), and have also referenced him in my full theory. I know that Tony hopes to bring my theory and indeed this whole blog to his attention.Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-61488913836574904852008-05-19T12:47:00.000+01:002008-05-19T12:47:00.000+01:00That is an interesting and well spoken contributio...That is an interesting and well spoken contribution. I sense a person who has been doing much thinking on these matters. Which is exactly what is needed always and everywhere, and particularly on a blog of this intense nature, where all are zealous thinkers, and should be so as comrades in arms. That Planck quote followed exactly on the heels of the point I made; very speedy of you! Thanks, RAC.SM Kovalinskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12137642942538595560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-19633667570460218252008-05-19T12:40:00.000+01:002008-05-19T12:40:00.000+01:00Yes, and then there is this giant push towards a u...Yes, and then there is this giant push towards a unified front in our popular media. Our children today are inundated with concepts of magic and the spiritual world. To borrow from an earlier quote:<BR/><BR/> "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." Max Planckrachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04591604405946458208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-66089686825865910392008-05-19T12:25:00.000+01:002008-05-19T12:25:00.000+01:00A good point, RAC. But there is much to the idea...A good point, RAC. But there is much to the idea that these warring ideologies can thaw, melt, and resolve themselves into the fuusion, without lengthy debate. Some of them can of themselves wither away, I do believe. There is much that is appearance, mask; symptom, consequence, incident of the 2 camps wanting to be split.SM Kovalinskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12137642942538595560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-11397705892821386462008-05-19T12:18:00.000+01:002008-05-19T12:18:00.000+01:00Karl: If you want to bridge that gap you must firs...Karl: If you want to bridge that gap you must first resolve the Evolution/Creation (non)debate... and you know what they did to Sheldrake.rachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04591604405946458208noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-41977077895619031022008-05-19T03:33:00.000+01:002008-05-19T03:33:00.000+01:00I wanted to add - please bear in mind that I have...I wanted to add - please bear in mind that I haven't slept in days so my thinking is hazy - the "where is the internet?" idea is very poised to help, it is a perfect advocate. I feel Tony's ITLAD (complemented by Daemon book) is brimming also with all sorts of "gap bridgers" : it never really reached its potential. If I could regain my former state in terms of finances and connections, I think I could see all of this flying, really flying: talk about "into the air"!!!SM Kovalinskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12137642942538595560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-69707203350928101242008-05-19T03:27:00.000+01:002008-05-19T03:27:00.000+01:00Well, this is my own opinion, about Tony's theori...Well, this is my own opinion, about Tony's theories, and your own; I do know a thing or two about this, as it has long been a "pet" obsession of sorts with me. I think in terms of America, and academia here, the dichotomy concerns a sort of technologically savvy mass, yet given to a wild and disordered spirituality. The ranks of the really great scientists, especially in the Universities, who ought to be acting as guides, have turned away (with some disgust?) and have formed a sort of atheistic elite, bemused and scornful. My own sympathies tend to the latter, and my own father was a scientist, an author of future-studies texts and it is these that strike me as robust. They are highly nuanced in their thinking: they are the ones who are most ripe for a true spiritual advance and understanding; the "mass" group needs to be led, and are unruly and untutored both. This may sound like a radical departure from the democratic ideal, but I think it is sound at its core, I stand by it. But there is something missing and sorely lacking; some gap that is not being bridged. When I first came upon Tony (an essay of his on the internet) I felt a "quickening", as if "movement is now possible". It was intuitive. He struck me as "made for America" and I thought of a bog of mud, loosening up and moving. I have already spoken of my opinion of your incorporation of him, and two-fold advance from you both. I have said this openly to you, and to Tony. I believe in a vital and dynamic advance to break a static choke-hold , a block which must move starting in the Universities. If this sounds grandiose, remember that I am on the one hand the daughter of a scientist who was deeply concerned with bridging this gap; I also descend from Alcott and the New England Transcendentalists: you might say I was "born" to notice you and Tony, to be concerned about you. Yet I am woefully fearful of meddling. I have more, much more, to say at a later time.SM Kovalinskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12137642942538595560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-13164943637110788082008-05-19T03:12:00.000+01:002008-05-19T03:12:00.000+01:00Susan Marie: As one of our esteemed American corre...<B>Susan Marie</B>: As one of our esteemed American correspondents on here can I ask you a question?<BR/><BR/>Do you think, given the dichotomy in the US at the moment between Science and Spirituality that my analogy would help bridge the gap and bring the concept of my theory to the Spiritualists without need of Science and to the Scientists without need for Spirituality?<BR/><BR/>Of course, we all know that ITLAD, CTF and my theory blend the two and more concepts together but they don't have to know that initially?<BR/><BR/>What do you think?Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-73286591830415690782008-05-18T17:41:00.000+01:002008-05-18T17:41:00.000+01:00Tony: Thank You Sire!And us ITLADian Ipssissimus t...<B>Tony</B>: Thank You Sire!<BR/><BR/>And us ITLADian Ipssissimus types tend to frolic best around the Witching hour.<BR/><BR/>*smiles and does that Christopher Lee type swooshy movement with an overly elaborate cape*Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-2272619795265988172008-05-18T17:30:00.000+01:002008-05-18T17:30:00.000+01:00Strewth Guys! It seems that all the action on this...Strewth Guys! It seems that all the action on this blog takes place around the Witching Hour (BST). I trurn my back on the blog and goes absolutely ballistic!!<BR/><BR/>KARL: Yet again a fascinating analogy. What is great about this blog is that it seems to act as this wonderful notepad by which we can all free associate ideas and it is there to be read again later. Simply wonderful.Anthony Peakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12199138770925114308noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-2385615666227506322008-05-18T00:29:00.000+01:002008-05-18T00:29:00.000+01:00Susan Marie: The list is growing yes. All these lu...<B>Susan Marie</B>: The list is growing yes. All these luminaries that I drag along in my bonce all day!!! Thank You, I am flattery and honured to be even remotely associated with such Genius.Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-11892383032621105922008-05-17T23:42:00.000+01:002008-05-17T23:42:00.000+01:00Excellent, then I needn't refrain from adding the...Excellent, then I needn't refrain from adding the Lord Alfred Douglass, too---and now I am done.SM Kovalinskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12137642942538595560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-74999563733224516212008-05-17T23:41:00.000+01:002008-05-17T23:41:00.000+01:00Susan Marie: Thank You Dear Lady, and with smatter...<B>Susan Marie</B>: Thank You Dear Lady, and with smatterings of others too.<BR/>I am a gestalt existentialism!Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-84404165128357513502008-05-17T23:39:00.000+01:002008-05-17T23:39:00.000+01:00With a hint of the Lord Byron.With a hint of the Lord Byron.SM Kovalinskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12137642942538595560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-51541116179563571512008-05-17T23:34:00.000+01:002008-05-17T23:34:00.000+01:00A fact known very well to those that know me!But I...A fact known very well to those that know me!<BR/>But I do it with panache and Wildean frippery.Karl Le Marcshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01402028443489182100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6467236423735891536.post-91307316521835998502008-05-17T23:24:00.000+01:002008-05-17T23:24:00.000+01:00Any excuse to flounce, Karl, you don't need much i...Any excuse to flounce, Karl, you don't need much incentive! LOLjoharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11493912194385361484noreply@blogger.com